That being said, if your income doesn't depend on editing, then I'd say that's a much more personal decision that only you can answer. FCP does everything I need and then some, and I just don't see any reason to go back to Premiere at all. The last time I did, I got so frustrated with how slow track-based editing was in comparison to what I'd become used to that I came to wonder why I was bothering. I pay for the Creative Cloud subscription because I need a lot of the software that comes with it, so I have access to Premiere myself. There are so many little things that add up to a much superior editing experience that for an independent videographer like myself it's well worth the investment. It saves a ton of time once you get familiar with it and its quirks, and now I can't imagine editing without things like compound clips, keyword collections, real-time skimming, etc. In my opinion, the magnetic timeline in FCP is one of the best innovations to happen to editing since the first NLE brought it to a computer. I've been editing since the tape-to-tape days, and over the years have used multiple NLE's including Media 100, Premiere and FCP (both classic and X). If your income depends on editing, it very well could be worth the investment as IMO FCP is a far superior editing platform. I'd say that depends entirely on what you're using it for and how easy it is for you to depart with $199.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |